Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Stephanie Nakhleh's avatar

This makes so much sense to me! But. Having sat through a bunch of local debates on exactly this type of thing (which I've been reporting on icymi), I know what our engineers will say: "Dilineators are bad because have to maintain them, and our snowplows willl hit them, which is annoying and expensive for us. But people will *feel* safer using dilineator-protected lanes and will bicycle more, which is bad, because posts aren't real protection, so if someone hits them, we get sued. Whereas if we do nothing at all nobody sues us even though it's dangerous as hell. Because the danger keeps everyone from even trying. So everyone stays in their cars, the way we like it." (OK, they'd put it a little differently, I am peering into their brains. I have been listening to them a lot.)

As I've been writing increasingly about how CYA dominates road safety (fear of lawsuits is the guiding principle, not fear of death/injury) I wonder how we get past this. Any ideas?

Aaron Shavel's avatar

Great post Andy. These kinds of upgrades may not be the most pretty but they are lighting fast and they work. I recently posted about my neighborhood facing this trade off and getting lost in the pursuit of perfection. In the meantime we are stuck with the status quo. Sometimes good enough is good enough!

https://aaronshavel.substack.com/p/sometimes-good-enough-is-good-enough?r=2lhx1h&utm_medium=ios

7 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?