Discussion about this post

User's avatar
SJStone's avatar

Yes. Urban areas should be all about pedestrians. Everything we build in an urban area should benefit the people who walk -- walkable neighborhoods, connections to other parts of the city via walking, bike paths, public transportation, even those shitty little scooters. But cars, yes, we need to build infrastructure for cars -- infrastructure that slows them and limits the damage they cause.

Expand full comment
Will Henke's avatar

I live just south of a dangerous S-curve, with a posted advisory speed limit of 25mph, on a "minor arterial" where the legal speed limit is 40. There was yet another deadly crash where a drunk driver ran off the road and killed workers in someone's front yard in September 2022. The City made plans to install transverse thermoplastic rumble strips to warn drivers about the upcoming S-curve, thinking that that would solve it. I called Traffic Engineering and asked about instead installing raised crosswalks on either end of the S-curve to force compliance with the 25mph advisory speed limit (and allow neighbors to actually cross the street), and I was told that the City couldn't do that because slowing down cars to the actual advised speed by speed table would cause so much congestion that "you wouldn't be able to get out of your driveway." The City's commitment to keeping this road functioning at an acceptable LOS for an arterial and requiring commuting motorists to navigate this dangerous S-curve at well-above the advised speed for the 2 horizontal curves, while also providing residential access and seeming to care about loss-of-life, is a kind of trying to "have your cake and eat it too." What it really says to me is that the loss of life is bad, but impeding commuting motorists is worse.

Expand full comment
5 more comments...

No posts