Should we treat the local bus like a social program?
There's a way of framing public transit that makes the bus a useful mobility tool for everyone.
I sometimes write for other outlets. From the freelance files, this was originally published by Fast Company.
When transit is frequent, safe, and reliable, it's more than just a service. It's infrastructure.
You don’t wait for the sidewalk. You don’t check an app to see if it’s working. You don’t wonder if it’s meant for someone else. Sidewalks are just there—always available, always on. And when they’re well-designed, you barely notice them. They quietly support everything: commerce, mobility, safety, health, and freedom of movement. Sidewalks don’t require instructions. They’re intuitive. Step on, move forward.
That’s the framing we need for local bus service. A well-run bus system is an express sidewalk—a piece of infrastructure that dramatically expands the number of destinations within walking distance.
Unfortunately, buses aren’t thought of that way. In most American cities, public transit is treated like a last-resort service, a social program for people who can’t afford cars, something to be endured rather than embraced. And so they’re designed that way: infrequent, inconvenient, hard to use, and often stuck in traffic.
If a bus system is going to function as a seamless extension of the sidewalk, it has to operate on the same principles:
Frequency. You don’t plan your life around a sidewalk’s availability.
Convenience. Buses must go where people actually want to go, with direct routes that don’t meander like a bureaucrat’s fantasy map.
Safety. Waiting at a stop should feel as safe and dignified as standing on a downtown corner.
Reliability. If you can’t trust it to arrive when it says it will, it’s not infrastructure—it’s a gamble.
If general purpose car traffic dominates the curb, buses will never scale, and walking—the most ancient, equitable form of transport—remains functionally capped. Dedicated transit lanes are the asphalt equivalent of pouring a continuous slab of concrete for pedestrians. Bus-only lanes ensure that the people choosing high-efficiency transportation aren’t punished for it. (As an added bonus, people can ride bikes in the bus lanes.)
Treat the bus like a sidewalk, and people will use it like one.
Most Americans only experience a transit system that treats them like a priority when they travel overseas. “It was amazing, we didn’t even have to rent a car.” Here in the US, we’ve been conditioned to expect low-frequency bus service with few shelters, unpredictable arrivals, and a cultural subtext that transit is a charity case for those people. But we don’t build sidewalks out of pity. We build them because they’re essential infrastructure like plumbing or electricity.
If we want to cut congestion, reduce emissions, boost economic access, and improve quality of life, we already have the most elegant, human-scaled delivery system imaginable: walking. But to expand the range of walkability, we need a mobility system that functions like walking at scale—intuitive, frequent, and always ready. That’s what a local transit system could be.
The moment we stop treating the bus as a social program and start treating it like an express sidewalk, we unlock a public good that meets people where they are and moves them forward.
The bus can’t be stuck in traffic.
If the local bus is going to function as an express sidewalk, I can’t overstate the importance of high-frequency, reliable service. That means it can’t be stuck in traffic jams. On multi-lane roads, the obvious answer is dedicated transit lanes.
Transportation experts typically think of road reconfigurations as replacing general purpose lanes with bike lanes and a center bi-directional left-turn lane. But on a busy transit corridor, the road diet can just as easily be designed for express sidewalks.
You don’t have to be a professional engineer or graphic artist to come up with renderings that illustrate before-and-after scenarios for a street in your community. Streetmix is a free web tool that’s ridiculously easy to use. It’s set up for drag-and-drop design so you can make a typical section that reflects your local conditions. Here’s a short article with instructions to use Streetmix (free!) and Google Maps (free!) to design the future you want, instead of the one you’ve been told is inevitable.
A bus isn’t charity, it’s concrete infrastructure that expands the reach of your feet. When we treat it like an express sidewalk—built for frequency, protected from gridlock, and trusted like any utility—it stops being a backup plan and starts being the backbone of a thriving city. We don’t need to convince people to ride the bus. We just need to operate it like we mean it.
As someone who doesnt drive, or know how, but has moved to a city where the buses run twice an hour, are often late and stop runnimg by 10pm during the week - I have seriously considered getting a car.
Moving to places like Seattle or NYC is expensive. Many cities have massive gaps in their public transit system. You can only get so far and then have to walk. Setting up shelters for all stops is very much not a priority. Having useful and reliable transit to get to other parts of the state is also a non-issue.
I have noticed that the average American really doesnt care about public transit. There is a massive cultural indifference; either get a car or be left behind. Which is kind of hilarious because some alt right people lose their minds at 15 minute cities. And cities themselves seem to see public transit as a courtesy they offer for living there but not a necessity.
I've aready reasoned that I will need to either get a car or leave the US (but still live in a major city). Having to walk for 45 minutes when it is 90 degrees outside because there is no bus service where you are going is a reality for many people. And Uber/Lyft arent always viable or affordable options.
Bicycles in the bus lane - rediculous. Slows down the buses and endangers the bicyclist. Bicycles on the sidewalk - smart. Legal in the city of Seattle (and the state of Washington). I walk, bicycle (about 3 miles per day), and take the bus. I'm a 78-year-old who quit driving 4 years ago to minimize greenhouse gas emissions.
The big picture:
Make varied expansions of the following topic a recurring focus of your messaging. Doing so would be a major contribution to combating global warming.
Consumers (individuals, organizations, businesses, governments) must promptly minimize their greenhouse gas emissions to bridge the gap while we work on long-term green technology and infrastructure. Less heating and less cooling (none between 13C-30C/55F-85F, https://greenbetween.home.blog). Less driving. Less flying. Less meat-eating. Less population growth (2 children per family). Do it yourself. Tenaciously encourage others to do it. Tenaciously encourage others to tenaciously encourage others.
Embrace the message and tenaciously introduce the message "business card" to all you encounter. (You can print the business card 12 per 8.5x11 using a file from the Promote page of the website.)
Be a climate superhero - take it to the next level. Promote the message at local events. (Files for posters are available on the Promote page of the website.)