Civil engineers often describe their finished projects as "over-engineered," implying they are overly safe and robust. They’ve gone the extra mile. The calculations said one steel beam was enough, but they used two.
When it comes to surface streets meant for public access, can a street ever be too safe? And considering traffic casualties are an equivalent of a 9/11 every month, year after year, who would even try claiming streets are overly safe?
The standard multi-lane arterial is designed for high-speed driving, but also expected to accommodate bicyclists and pedestrians from surrounding areas. Decades of research shows this type of design leads to more and deadlier crashes, especially for vulnerable road users.
A pedestrian hit by a 40 mph car is almost guaranteed to die. A pedestrian hit at 20 mph is almost guaranteed to survive. Curious then, that the standard American arterial is posted at 45 mph. So for drivers who follow the rules, a crash with someone walking will almost always be deadly.
But take traffic law obedience out of the mix. The road itself is typically designed for much higher speeds than the posted signs. Engineers are trained to design width, curves, and sightlines for motorists to feel comfortable going much faster than a law might allow. Even the style, fonts, and placement of signs and lights are intended for high speed driving.
A road is under-engineered when it doesn't account for the threat to people walking and bicycling. It's under-engineered when it ignores neighborhood context.
Sacrificing safety for speed is under-engineering. Over-engineering would be in the direction of protected bike lanes, placemaking, and traffic calming.
Not all arterials are the same, regardless of what a DOT design manual claims. Some make sense for long-distance trips and higher speeds, but not when they’re used for local trips in population clusters.
Language matters. Listen for the subtle manipulation of terms like over-engineered.
Great point. Over engineered for who or what, exactly, is something I have asked myself before. Thanks for reminder that language matters
Cars Racing In Residential Area
https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLMfNAGP-iqfhIdd_slxdvUSsNglyBJF_T
Crashes / Collisions
https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLMfNAGP-iqfhSodZr8JiSf3PlVNbPeP0m
Cars over 70mph in 40mph Residential Area Near Metra Station, Park, & Two Major Regional Trail Systems
https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLMfNAGP-iqfjctZ2JAq2MQ4X3Gqch2tG3
Kids Crossing SW Hwy
https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLMfNAGP-iqfiC8j0o4t-C1b6D0-AnlpEZ
Kids With No Safe Sidewalks
https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLMfNAGP-iqfiZtumbPzkIUyndNiGewLmt
Walkers & Joggers Crossing SW Hwy
https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLMfNAGP-iqfhMHPnXuD1FJmg4FFnCDRNI
Cyclists Crossing SW Hwy
https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLMfNAGP-iqfiXKag2SIgr6--a3ZPk0rIt
Cars Who "Punch It" Aggressively After Having To Wait Behind Turning Cars Due To No Turn Lane
https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLMfNAGP-iqfiKOcXHbEEV-T7aU5q2P0Lf
Metra Commuters Crossing SW Hwy
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLMfNAGP-iqfi4fgcd0lpf7B5G4PEv6O5Z
MAJOR Community Traffic Hazard Hwy IL-7 at Timber Ln in Palos Park_Current_Volume1_90Percent.pdf
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1S0v8jnJ_pqAwd-JQyqIQz2OGaqXXQFiG/view?usp=drivesdk
MAJOR Community Traffic Hazard SW Hwy IL-7 at Timber Ln in Palos Park_Current_Volume2_90Percent.pdf
https://drive.google.com/file/d/11KXIIzfHFQ_QEjQ1Q0YWH4PZw3zjW3dx/view?usp=drivesdk
Palos Park 2018 Bikeways and Trails Plan
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Gr7vnmnwur3IN0HV7F8WU3_4SF1YaTQQ/view?usp=share_link
IDOT PLANNING INTERACTIVE MAP
https://idotatp.altaplanning.cloud/?utm_medium=email&utm_source=govdelivery#/add-feature/6
https://idotatp.altaplanning.cloud/?utm_medium=email&utm_source=govdelivery
Pedestrian Barrier:
Misaligned 4-way intersection w unmarked, heavily used skewed crossover of IL-7 located 500ft from Metra Station, Post Office, Park w Municipal Pool and Trail Systems. Repeat crashes(18 in 24 months), traffic goes 50-70mph along 40mph Residential lined arterial-should be 35 or less. Unsafe to cross.
Crash Report:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1S0v8jnJ_pqAwdJQyqIQz2OGaqXXQFiG/view?usp=drivesdk
Pedestrian Study:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/11KXIIzfHFQ_QEjQ1Q0YWH4PZw3zjW3dx/view?usp=drivesdk